Palmerbet accepted bets from a self-excluded customer for 18 months due to inaccurate data submission, as ACMA uncovers hundreds of BetStop compliance failures and orders court-enforceable remediation.
Palmerbet BetStop failures led to 18-month access for self-excluded customer. ACMA found 18 section 61KA(3) contraventions for licensed services and 535 section 61MB(5) contraventions for delayed account closure. Customer deposited funds from September 2023 to February 2025 before account finally closed on 22 February 2025.
- 18 Months of Unauthorized Wagering
- Data Errors Enabled Continued Access
- Court-Enforceable Undertaking Required
- Broader ACMA Enforcement Actions
Palmerbet kept a self-excluded customer active for 18 months. The individual registered with BetStop on 2 September 2023. Palmerbet accepted 18 separate bets between December 2024 and February 2025. The account finally closed on 22 February 2025. ACMA identified hundreds of contraventions stemming from this single case. The operator entered an 18-month court-enforceable undertaking with the Australian Communications and Media Authority.
18 Months of Unauthorized Wagering
The customer deposited funds from September 2023 until February 2025. Every deposit represented potential harm to a person actively excluding themselves from gambling. Palmerbet failed to close the account within “as soon as practicable” timeframe. The Interactive Gambling Act 2001 mandates immediate closure upon BetStop registration.
ACMA counted 18 contraventions of section 61KA(3) for providing licensed interactive wagering services to a self-excluded individual. One contravention applied for each day of continued service. The regulator also identified 535 contraventions of section 61MB(5) for failing to close the customer’s account promptly. Each day beyond the practicable closure date counted as a separate violation.
Palmerbet accepted bets on 18 separate occasions between December 2024 and February 2025. The pattern suggests systematic failures rather than isolated incidents. The company failed to verify self-exclusion status before processing each wager. ACMA’s investigation revealed multiple contraventions across different compliance categories.
Data Errors Enabled Continued Access
The NSER functions by matching customers’ personal details against the register’s database. Operators must provide precise personal information including legal full names, date of birth, and postcode. Palmerbet repeatedly submitted NSER checks using incorrect personal details. A shortened first name and erroneous date of birth caused negative matches from the register.
Records indicated Palmerbet first flagged this individual on 6 September 2023. The initial submission used flawed information. The register returned a positive match only on 22 February 2025. Palmerbet finally closed the account after confirmation. Had accurate data been provided in September 2023, the account could have closed within 24 hours.
Palmerbet updated its onboarding procedures in mid-2023. The company verified DOB and other details during this period. However, the operator failed to apply consistent verification to legacy accounts. This customer’s account fell into that category. The regulator concluded Palmerbet lacked reasonable precautions for identity data handling.
Court-Enforceable Undertaking Required
ACMA accepted Palmerbet’s commitment via an 18-month court-enforceable undertaking. The company will conduct an independent review of NSER compliance systems and processes. Palmerbet must also refund all deposits made by the self-excluded individual from September 2023 to February 2025. This approach avoids immediate civil penalties while ensuring remediation.
Earlier this month, wagering operator Dabble Sports also faced penalties for BetStop compliance failures. ACMA member Carolyn Lidgerwood stressed the importance of respecting self-exclusion decisions. She stated providers must have robust systems in place. Palmerbet’s case reinforces these enforcement priorities across the Australian market.
The ACMA and register operator issued technical specifications before NSER’s launch. Exact name and DOB data from Australian government documents confirm identity. Further guidance reiterated in March 2024. Palmerbet’s failures demonstrate ongoing compliance challenges despite regulatory guidance. AGBrief monitors regulatory developments across gaming jurisdictions.
Broader ACMA Enforcement Actions
ACMA requested internet service providers block access to more illegal gambling websites this week. The latest blocking requests target Bet Ninja, Riobet188, ThePokies33, Spade69, and WinShark. This action forms part of a multi-year enforcement campaign. Since November 2019, ACMA has asked ISPs to block a total of 1,822 illegal gambling and affiliate websites.
Twelve websites were requested for blocking in June of this year. The regulator noted more than 230 operators exited the Australian market following stricter enforcement measures from 2017 onwards. Palmerbet’s case adds to this pattern of regulatory pressure. Compliance failures attract significant penalties and enforcement actions.
Australian wagering operators face rigorous self-exclusion requirements. BetStop registration remains mandatory for all licensed providers. The register has grown significantly since its implementation. Palmerbet’s 18-month breach represents one of the more severe cases. ACMA continues strengthening enforcement of consumer protection standards.
Frequently Asked Questions
How long did Palmerbet allow the self-excluded customer to access?
Palmerbet kept the customer active for 18 months from September 2023 to February 2025. The individual registered with BetStop on 2 September 2023 and Palmerbet accepted 18 separate bets between December 2024 and February 2025.
What caused the BetStop compliance failures at Palmerbet?
Palmerbet submitted incorrect personal details including shortened first name and erroneous date of birth. These inaccuracies caused negative matches from BetStop, enabling ongoing wagering activity until 22 February 2025.
What penalties did Palmerbet face for BetStop breaches?
Palmerbet entered an 18-month court-enforceable undertaking with ACMA. The company must conduct independent review of NSER compliance systems and refund all deposits made by the self-excluded individual.
How many contraventions did ACMA identify at Palmerbet?
ACMA found 18 contraventions of section 61KA(3) for licensed services to self-excluded individuals. The regulator also identified 535 contraventions of section 61MB(5) for delayed account closure beyond practicable closure date.
What other illegal gambling sites did ACMA target recently?
ACMA requested ISPs block Bet Ninja, Riobet188, ThePokies33, Spade69, and WinShark. This action is part of a multi-year enforcement campaign targeting 1,822 illegal gambling and affiliate websites since November 2019.
How many operators have left the Australian gambling market?
More than 230 operators exited the Australian market following stricter enforcement measures from 2017 onwards. ACMA has asked ISPs to block 1,822 illegal gambling and affiliate websites since November 2019.
What is the Interactive Gambling Act 2001 requirement for self-exclusion?
The Interactive Gambling Act 2001 mandates operators close accounts “as soon as practicable” upon BetStop registration. ACMA identified 535 contraventions for Palmerbet’s delayed closure and 18 for providing licensed services to excluded individuals.
This article has been thoroughly researched and reviewed by the CasinoBait editorial team to ensure accuracy and relevance for Asian casino players.


